Title of article :
A street deposit sampling method for metal and
hydrocarbon contamination assessment
Author/Authors :
Fran¸cois-J´erˆome Brisa، نويسنده , , St´ephane Garnauda، نويسنده , , b، نويسنده , , Nicole Apperrya، نويسنده , ,
Ana Gonzaleza، نويسنده , , Jean-Marie Mouchelb، نويسنده , , Ghassan Chebbob، نويسنده , ,
Daniel R. Th´evenota، نويسنده , , U، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
هفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Abstract :
Urban surface contamination, by atmospheric deposits as well as human activities, is a major concern for urban
pollution management. Besides coarse street deposits which are clearly perceived and easily removed, suspended
solid SS. surface loads and contamination by heavy metals and hydrocarbons are rarely assessed although they could
be of major importance with regards to combined or separate server overflow CSO and SSO. impacts. Both dry and
wet vacuum sampling procedures have been first compared, in the laboratory, using dry and sieved clay or street
deposits. Then the wet vacuum sampling procedure has been refined, coupling the injection of water and the
hand-brushing of the surface prior to its vacuum cleaning, and evaluated on a car parking area close to the
University. Finally this procedure has been assessed in B´earn Street within the ‘Le Marais’ district in Paris centre,
and 34 samples have been analysed for metal and eight for aromatic hydrocarbon contamination. Heavy metal
concentrations 0.1]1.7 g kgy1 dry wt. Cu, 0.9]6.1 g kgy1 dry wt. Pb and 1.5]4.6 g kgy1dry wt. Zn. within street
deposit samples collected in Paris centre, indicate a high contamination, especially for copper and zinc, as compared
to reported data. Total polyaromatic hydrocarbons PAHs. are in the 3]11 mg kgy1 dry wt. range, thus approximately
10 times less contaminated than dry atmospheric deposits. This paper presents data obtained and discusses
the difficulties encountered when sampling street deposits in busy areas of a city like Paris. The water jet street
cleaning procedure used by Paris city workers was tested for its efficiency, by comparison of surface loads before and
after the cleaning procedure. Although solids cleaning efficiency is highly variable 20]65%. and somewhat higher for particles larger than 100 mm, particulate metal cleaning efficiency is even more variable 0]75%. and particulate
PAHs appear not to be significantly removed.
Keywords :
Vacuum , Urban catchment , Streetcleaning , water jet , Urban deposits , Street , Particles , Metal , Hydrocarbons , PAH , Sampling method
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment