Author/Authors :
S.P. Theocharopoulosa، نويسنده , , U، نويسنده , , G. Wagnerb، نويسنده , , J. Sprengartb، نويسنده , , M-E. Mohrb، نويسنده , ,
A. Desaulesc، نويسنده , ,
H. Muntaud، نويسنده , , M. Christoua، نويسنده , , P. Quevauvillere، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The soil sampling guidelines used in European countries ESSG., as kindly provided by the national institutions
which participated in the project, have been recorded, studied, evaluated and presented in this paper. The aim has
been to ascertain what soil sampling guidelines exist in Europe; to detect similarities and differences comparable
results., advantages and deficiencies; to identify incompatible strategies and evaluate how methodologies might affect
data quality; to investigate sources of deviations or uncertainties; to improve comparability and representativeness of
soil sampling; to investigate the need for harmonised sampling guidelines; and to develop suggestions for standard
operating procedures SOP.. Soil sampling guidelines throughout Europe differ as to whether they are applied by
law, or used throughout the country. In some countries these are ISOrDIS related or based ISO 10381-1, 1995; ISO
10381-2, 1995., or are produced by a scientific society or a standardisation body. As far as sampling strategy is
concerned, not all sampling guidelines clearly describe the sampling scale, the specifications for contamination risk
precautions, the sampling plan and protocol structure and the pre-analysis treatment of the soil samples. The
purpose for sampling, in descending order of frequency, is soil pollution, soil fertilisation, general soil monitoring,
background risk assessment, or else it is not specified. The majority of countries do not sample the top organic
matter separately. Sampling depth is either related to the morphogenetic horizon or to ad hoc sampling depth, which
is not specified in all cases. They suggest mass- and volume-related soil sampling, while the sampling pattern is not
presented in all national guidelines. The criteria for area, site, unit, sub-unit, and point selection are mainly based on
pedology and land use, following the history and pre-screening information or geology, or is site related. Some
guidelines suggest the division of sampling units into sub-units. The sampling pattern is mainly grid sampling, grid
and random sampling, or not mentioned. Sampling density inside the sampling unit either varies greatly or it is not
mentioned, while the size of the sampling unit varies widely. Most guidelines require the collection of composite instead of simple samples, while some prefer sampling soil profiles. In the European SSG many technical details and
steps are either not defined or vary, while in the pre-analysis treatment quality assurance QA. and quality control
QC. approaches are used either both in the lab and in the field, or only in the field, or are not mentioned. The
common points and the points in which harmonisation could be started or achieved are discussed
Keywords :
Soil quality , European soil sampling guidelines , soil pollution , soil sampling