Title of article :
Quantitative evaluation of the CEEM soil sampling
intercomparison
Author/Authors :
G. Wagnera، نويسنده , , U، نويسنده , , P. Lischerb، نويسنده , , S. Theocharopoulosc، نويسنده , ,
H. Muntaud، نويسنده , ,
A. Desaulese، نويسنده , , Ph. Quevauvillerf، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
هفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
The aim of the CEEM soil project was to compare and to test the soil sampling and sample preparation guidelines
used in the member states of the European Union and Switzerland for investigations of background and large-scale
contamination of soils, soil monitoring and environmental risk assessments. The results of the comparative
evaluation of the sampling guidelines demonstrated that, in soil contamination studies carried out with different
sampling strategies and methods, comparable results can hardly be expected. Therefore, a reference database RDB.
was established by the organisers, which acted as a basis for the quantitative comparison of the participants’ results.
The detected deviations were related to the methodological details of the individual strategies. The comparative
evaluation concept consisted of three steps: The first step was a comparison of the participants’ samples which were
both centrally and individually analysed. between each other, as well as with the reference data base RDB. and
some given soil quality standards on the level of concentrations present. The comparison was made using the
example of the metals cadmium, copper, lead and zinc. As a second step, the absolute and relative deviations
between the reference database and the participants’ results both centrally analysed under repeatability conditions.
were calculated. The comparability of the samples with the RDB was categorised on four levels. Methods of
exploratory statistical analysis were applied to estimate the differential method bias among the participants. The
levels of error caused by sampling and sample preparation were compared with those caused by the analytical
procedures. As a third step, the methodological profiles of the participants were compiled to concisely describe the
different procedures used. They were related to the results to find out the main factors leading to their incomparability.
The outcome of this evaluation process was a list of strategies and methods, which are problematic with respect
to comparability, and should be standardised andror specified in order to arrive at representative and comparable results in soil contamination studies throughout Europe. Pre-normative recommendations for harmonising European
soil sampling guidelines and standard operating procedures have been outlined in Wagner G, Desules A, Muntau H,
Theocharopoulos S. Comparative Evaluation of European Methods for Sampling and Sample Preparation of Soils for
Inorganic Analysis CEEM Soil.. Final Report of the Contract SMT4-CT96-2085, Sci Total Environ 2001;264:181]186.
Wagner G, Desaules A, Munatu H, Theocharopolous S, Quevauvaller Ph. Suggestions for harmonising sampling and
sample pre-treatment procedures and improving quality assurance in pre-analytical steps of soil contamination
studies. Paper 1.7 Sci Total Environ 2001b;264:103]118
Keywords :
Soil sampling , sample preparation , Comparability , Sampling intercomparison , Uncertainty , Deviations , Heavy metals , Robust statistics
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment