Title of article
Occupational dermatitis in a highly industrialized Italian region: the experience of four occupational health departments
Author/Authors
M. Crippab، نويسنده , , A. Baruffinid، نويسنده , , L. Bellerib، نويسنده , , A. Cirlac، نويسنده , , P. Leghissaa، نويسنده , , R. Pisatic، نويسنده , , A. Pomesanoa، نويسنده , , R. Valsecchia، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages
8
From page
89
To page
96
Abstract
There is a need for several research centers to carry out coordinated large-scale evaluation of the spread of
occupational irritant and allergic dermatitis. The Occupational Health Departments of Bergamo, Brescia, Lecco and
Cremona therefore decided to join their experiences and bring together all the cases of occupational irritant and
allergic dermatitis diagnosed by these Departments between 1993 and 1998. In this period, 1169 cases of occupational
dermatitis were diagnosed, subdivided into 768 cases of allergic contact dermatitis ŽACD., 337 of irritant contact
dermatitis ŽICD., 54 of urticaria and 10 of airborne contact dermatitis, and there has not been a trend towards
increase of occupational dermatitis over the years. Our population included 724 males and 445 females and average
latency after the beginning of exposure to occupational allergens was 8.01 years for ACD, 6.4 for ICD, 3.22 for
urticaria and 5.57 for airborne contact dermatitis. The frequency of atopy was 33.9% in females and 19.5% in males.
The frequency of atopy was particularly high Ž89%. in subjects with urticaria. Among subjects with allergic
dermatitis, 362 had had only one sensitization while 406 had had two or more sensitizations. The working areas
where we found the highest number of ACD were metal working industry, building, health care workers and
hairdressers and the frequency of ICD was high in metal workers and health care workers. Most of the cases of urticaria were diagnosed in health care workers Ž68.5%. and the main causing agent was latex. These are only
preliminary data but occupations at risk and the substances expected to be the most frequent etiological agents do
not differ significantly from those reported in the literature. It is hoped that as a result of this project there will be in
the future: standardization of diagnostic procedures, uniform assessment of allergological risk in working environments
not yet fully investigated, standardization of preventative measures and proper evaluation of their effectiveness.
Keywords
Occupational dermatitis , Irritant contact dermatitis , Allergic contact dermatitis , urticaria , Frequency , Causative agents
Journal title
Science of the Total Environment
Serial Year
2001
Journal title
Science of the Total Environment
Record number
982568
Link To Document