Title of article :
Field experiment on spray drift: Deposition and airborne drift
during application to a winter wheat crop
Author/Authors :
André Woltersa، نويسنده , , ?، نويسنده , , 1، نويسنده , , Volker Linnemanna، نويسنده , , 2، نويسنده , , Jan C. van de Zandeb، نويسنده , , Harry Vereeckena، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
A field experiment was performed to evaluate various techniques for measuring spray
deposition and airborne drift during spray application to a winter wheat crop. The application
of a spraying agent containing the fluorescent dye Brilliant Sulfo Flavine by a conventional
boom sprayer was done according to good agricultural practice. Deposition was measured by
horizontal collectors in various arrangements in and outside the treated area. Airborne spray
drift was measured both with a passive and an active air collecting system. Spray deposits on
top of the treated canopy ranged between 68 and 71% of the applied dose and showed only
small differences for various arrangements of the collectors. Furthermore, onlysmall variations
weremeasured within the various groups of collectors used for these arrangements. Generally,
the highest spray deposition outside the treated area was measured close to the sprayed plot
and was accompanied by a high variability of values, while a rapid decline of deposits was
detected in more remote areas. Estimations of spray deposits with the IMAG Drift Calculator
were in accordance with experimental findings only for areas located at a distance of 0.5–4.5m
fromthe lastnozzle,while therewas anoverestimationof a factor of 4 at a distance of 2.0–3.0m,
thus revealing a high level of uncertainty of the estimation of deposition for short distances.
Airborne spray drift measured by passive and active air collecting systems was approximately
at the same level, when taking into consideration the collector efficiency of the woven nylon
wire used as sampling material for the passive collecting system. Themaximumvalue of total
airborne spray drift for both spray applications (0.79% of the applied dose) was determined by
the active collecting system. However, the comparatively high variability of measurements at
variousheights above the soil by active and passive collectingsystems revealedneedfor further
studies to elucidate the spatial pattern of airborne spray drift.
Keywords :
Active samplingDepositionDrift CalculatorPassive samplingSpray drift
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment