Author/Authors :
George Richardson a، نويسنده , , *، نويسنده , , Andrew Barton b، نويسنده , , Meryl Basham b، نويسنده , , Chris Foy c، نويسنده , ,
Susan Ann Eick a، نويسنده , , Margaret Somerville b
on behalf of the Torbay Healthy Housing Group، نويسنده , , Torquay، نويسنده , , UKA three-year study (1999–2001) was initiated in the UK to assess the effect of improving housing conditions in 3–4
bedroom، نويسنده , , single-family unit، نويسنده , , social rented sector houses on the health of the occupants. The houses were randomised into two
groups. Phase I houses received extensive upgrading including wet central heating، نويسنده , , on demand ventilation، نويسنده , , double-glazed doors، نويسنده , ,
cavity wall and roof/loft insulation. An identical intervention for Phase II houses was delayed for one year. As part of this
randomised waiting list study، نويسنده , , discrete measurements were made of indoor environmental variables in each house، نويسنده , , to assess the
short-term effects of improving housing conditions on the indoor environment. Variables representative of indoor environmental
conditions were measured in the living room، نويسنده , , bedroom and outdoors in each of the three years of the study. In 2000، نويسنده , , but by 2001 the Phase I houses had reverted to
the same dampness levels they had before upgrading. The housing upgrades increased bedroom temperatures in all houses.
Other indoor environmental variables were not affected.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
A three-year study (1999–2001) was initiated in the UK to assess the effect of improving housing conditions in 3–4
bedroom, single-family unit, social rented sector houses on the health of the occupants. The houses were randomised into two
groups. Phase I houses received extensive upgrading including wet central heating, on demand ventilation, double-glazed doors,
cavity wall and roof/loft insulation. An identical intervention for Phase II houses was delayed for one year. As part of this
randomised waiting list study, discrete measurements were made of indoor environmental variables in each house, to assess the
short-term effects of improving housing conditions on the indoor environment. Variables representative of indoor environmental
conditions were measured in the living room, bedroom and outdoors in each of the three years of the study. In 2000, there was a
significant difference between the changes from 1999 to 2000 between Phase I (upgraded) and II (not then upgraded) houses for
bedroom temperatures ( p =0.002). Changes in wall surface dampness and wall dampness in Phase I houses were also
significantly different to the change in Phase II houses in 2000 ( p =0.001), but by 2001 the Phase I houses had reverted to
the same dampness levels they had before upgrading. The housing upgrades increased bedroom temperatures in all houses.
Other indoor environmental variables were not affected.
Keywords :
Randomised trial , Social housing , Indoor air quality , Housing upgrades , Housing and health