Title of article :
1-Hydroxypyrene and 3-hydroxybenzo[a]pyrene as biomarkers of exposure to PAH in various environmental exposure situations Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Ariane Leroyer، نويسنده , , Fanny Jeandel، نويسنده , , Anne Maître، نويسنده , , Mike Howsam، نويسنده , , Dominique Deplanque، نويسنده , , Muriel Mazzuca، نويسنده , , Catherine Nisse، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Abstract :
Objective
To evaluate the utility of urinary 3-hydroxybenzo[a]pyrene (3-OH-B[a]P) as a biomarker of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in various environmental exposure scenarios alongside the more usually studied 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OH-Pyr).
Methods
Two groups of 15 and 10 non smoking, healthy men and women, were exposed for approximately 6 h to ambient air at two outdoor locations close to metallurgical industries, and at one indoor location in an urban setting. Atmospheric measurements of 16 “priority” PAHs were carried out during each exposure. Urinary 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P were also analysed, samples being taken the morning before exposure, at the end of exposure, then 4 and 15 h after the end of exposure. Urinary 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P were analysed using high performance liquid chromatograph with fluorescence detection. Limits of detection (LOD) were 0.092 nmol/L and 0.28 pmol/L for 1-OH-Pyr and 3-OH-B[a]P respectively.
Results
Average ambient air concentrations varied from 0.27 to 2.87 ng/m3 for pyrene, 0.04 to 1.20 ng/m3 for B[a]P, and from 70.0 to 910.6 ng/m3 for the sum of the 16 PAH (ΣPAHs). Concentrations of 1-OH-Pyr were not correlated with atmospheric concentrations of PAHs to which subjects were exposed, nor with the concentrations of 3-OH-B[a]P. Nearly 80% of measurements of 3-OH-B[a]P were lower than the LOD and no relationship between atmospheric concentrations and urinary metabolites was observable. However, the percentage of post-exposure values of 3-OH-B[a]P greater than the LOD increased significantly with the median of atmospheric concentrations of Pyr, B[a]P and ΣPAH at the different sites (test of linear trend, p < 0.02 in all cases).
Conclusion
Although we used very sensitive techniques for the measurements of urinary metabolites, especially for 3-OH-B[a]P, neither 1-OH-Pyr nor 3-OH-B[a]P were an unequivocal biomarker of exposure to atmospheric PAHs in environmental exposure scenarios relevant to the general population. It would be interesting to investigate other urinary monohydroxy PAH metabolites in this context.
Keywords :
Environmental exposure , Biomarkers , 1-Hydroxypyrene , Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment