Author/Authors :
Simforoosh، Nasser نويسنده , , Soltani، Mohammad Hossein نويسنده Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. , , Hosseini Sharifi، Seyed Hossein Hosseini Sharifi نويسنده Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , , Ahanian، Ali نويسنده , , Lashay، Alireza نويسنده , , Arab، Davood نويسنده Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran. , , Zare، Samad نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Purpose: To present the safety and surgical outcomes of the initial series of mini-laparoscopic
live donor nephrectomy and graft outcomes in related recipients.
Materials and Methods: From January 2012 through July 2012, fifty patients underwent minilaparoscopic
live donor nephrectomy. Two 3.5 mm trocars were inserted above and lateral to
the umbilicus for grasping and scissoring. One 5 mm trocar with a camera was inserted in the
umbilicus and an 11 mm trocar was inserted through fascia from a 6-8 cm Pfannenstiel incision
for bipolar coagulation, kidney extraction, and vascular clip applier.
Results: Mean age of donors was 28 ± 4.2 (range, 21-39) years. Mean operative time from
trocar insertion was 145.8 (range, 85-210) minutes. No major perioperative or postoperative
complications occurred. The average decrease in hemoglobin level was 1.14 (range, 0.32-1.8)
mg/dL and no one required blood transfusion. Mean warm ischemia time was 4.41 (range, 2.35-
9) minutes. Mean hospital stay was 2.2 (range, 2-5) days. Mean follow-up time of the recipients
was 215 (range, 130-270) days. The mean serum creatinine level of the recipients at discharge
time and the last follow-up visit was 1.38 mg/dL and 1.22 mg/dL, respectively.
Conclusions: While the primary purpose of this technique is to make donor nephrectomy less
invasive and more cosmetic, it is also comfortable for the laparoscopist surgeons because it is
nearly similar to standard laparoscopy. A randomized controlled trial with a large sample size,
long-term follow-up, and comparison with standard laparoscopy are necessary to present more
definitive data about this technique.