• Title of article

    Does remediation save lives? — On the cost of cleaning up arsenic-contaminated sites in Sweden Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Johanna Forslund، نويسنده , , Eva Samakovlis، نويسنده , , Maria Vredin Johansson، نويسنده , , Lars Barregard، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    3085
  • To page
    3091
  • Abstract
    Sweden has only just begun remediation of its many contaminated sites, a process that will cost an estimated SEK 60,000 million (USD 9100 million). Although the risk assessment method, carried out by the Swedish EPA, is driven by health effects, it does not consider actual exposure. Instead, the sites are assessed based on divergence from guideline values. This paper uses an environmental medicine approach that takes exposure into account to analyse how cancer risks on and near arsenic-contaminated sites are implicitly valued in the remediation process. The results show that the level of ambition is high. At 23 contaminated sites, the cost per life saved varies from SEK 287 million to SEK 1,835,000 million, despite conservative calculations that in fact probably underestimate the costs. It is concluded that if environmental health risks are to be reduced, there are probably other areas where economic resources can be used more cost-effectively.
  • Keywords
    remediation , Number of lives saved , Policy evaluation , Subsidies , Contaminated sites
  • Journal title
    Science of the Total Environment
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Science of the Total Environment
  • Record number

    986755