التجربة الانتخابية في موريتانيا.. في افق الانتقال الديمقراطي اي نمط انتخابي يحسن اعتماده؟

In this approach, we seek to identify the voting patterns used in Mauritania: when and how they were adopted and what is their impact on Mauritanian political life? The state's ability to address the pressing livelihood concerns of the people, foremost of which is poverty. More than 46 percent of Mauritanians live below the poverty line. Including that any pluralistic political experience requires dialogue and interaction between the various components of the political scene, which is something that has often been absent from the Mauritanian scene, especially if we look at the relationship between political actors loyal to the regime (the loyalist parties) and those opposed to it (the opposition parties), which often It is characterized by a kind of estrangement. Including the nature of the Mauritanian society, which is made up of Arabs/Berbers (Al-Baydan), and Haratines (they are former slaves who combine African origins and integrate culturally and linguistically with the Beidan), and Africans (Pulaar, Soninki, and Wolof). This ethnic and cultural diversity often affected political affairs. Including, and not the least significant, is the military and political presence and its influence on public life since the coup against former President Mokhtar Ould Daddah in July 1978 until today. All these factors undoubtedly affect the Mauritanian political action, and it is not possible to talk about electoral patterns or their impact on political life without invoking these factors.