تخصيص العام بالمفهوم عند الاصوليين

Allocating the general to the concept of the fundamentalists

The present research aims to address the issue of specifying Al- amm(1) by the semantic text or the implied meaning (al-mafhum). According to the majority of Usul al Fiqh scholars, (al–dalalat) textual implications can be classified into (Mantouq) the pronounced meaning and (Mafhum) the semantic text or the implied meaning. This study has been discussed the jurisprudential meaning of Al-amm, al- khass(2) and Al –mafhum as well as their types, semantic texts and legitimacy. The researcher has also analysed Usul al Fiqh scholars’ perspective regarding the process of specifying (Al–amm) by the semantic text or the implied meaning (Al -mafhum). In addition to that, this research has focused on Fiqh applications based on such linguistic processin establishing Sharia rulings. The researcher has come to the conclusion that Usul al Fiqh scholars has differed in the issue of specifying (Al–amm) by the semantic text or the implied meaning (Al – mafhum). However, their disagreement on the issue of specification of Al-amm by the divergent meaning (Mafhum al-Mukhalafah) was more obvious than specifying Al-amm by harmonious meaning (mafhum al-muwafaqah). Their disagreement has also led to the