اختلاف الفقهاء في حكم شركة المفاوضة

Reached at the end of this research is to, inter alia: 1. The provision of this company dispute the home of the scholars of them Licenser including inhibitor. 2. Those who went to the passport are the Hanafis. 3. that those who went to the prohibition are the Shafi'i and Hanbali scholars and the public. As in this company from prejudice, ignorance, in addition to the achievement of equality in everything is difficult. 4. Those who were compromise between the public and Hanafis are the Maalikis, said the passport, but they interpreted the bargaining company without explanation that interpreted Hanafis. Summed up: it can only be done with the contract without the funds from what is unique to each of them did not enter the capital in the company. 5. both teams holding a sign over his head and says. 6. that the public opinion is the strongest which is more correct. 7. opinion that Hanafis is The weaker say because their evidence is weak. 8. Hanafis on the passport quoted negotiation evidence the most important modern company Prophet : (negotiated with it the greatest of the pond), Zayla'i has commented on this talk that has no basis. 9. The company said the negotiation Hanafis sense, is not a realistic company, but found it not to its existence survival, including The requirement of equal mentioned do not stay long, but its survival is difficult to obtain, the misfire condition flipped Annana; because Annan and increase negotiation.Thank God that His grace is righteous