شماره ركورد كنفرانس :
3213
عنوان مقاله :
Model Uncertainty Assessment; Review of Available Approaches
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Model Uncertainty Assessment; Review of Available Approaches
پديدآورندگان :
Hoseyni Mohsen Department of Engineering - Science and Research branch - Islamic Azad University - Tehran -Iran , Pourgol-Mohammad Mohammad Sahand University of Technology - Tabriz - Iran
كليدواژه :
Structural Uncertainty , Model Uncertainty , Bayesian inference , Uncertainty Analysis
عنوان كنفرانس :
سومين كنفرانس مهندسي قابليت اطمينان
چكيده لاتين :
The term “model” refers to the way that the behavior of
a system or phenomenon of interest is predicted using
physical, verbal, human or mathematical
representations. A model is thought of as being
composed of the structural elements and relations, plus
a particular form reflecting how these elements and
relations interact. No model could represent the reality
as the exact way it exists because models are always
constructed on the simplifying assumptions to make a
complex problem manageable. Therefore uncertainty is
unavoidable in every modeling process. This becomes
more complicated as the dimensions of the problem
increases. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA/PSA),
thermo-hydraulics calculations (to resolve the safety
issues in nuclear industry) and environmental modeling
are good examples in this regard.
In general, uncertainty is involved in selecting the best
model among alternative models available. This
uncertainty is called model uncertainty. Two types of
model uncertainty (single model vs. multiple models)
will be discussed here. Although the model uncertainty
is a very important source of uncertainty, it is usually
ignored in the engineering applications. Model
uncertainty is in its early development stages in the
scientific community and there is no consensus
methodology for its characterization and quantification.
This paper is aimed at reviewing the subject matter to
evaluate the state of the art on the topic. Different
approaches proposed by various researchers for model
uncertainty quantification will be presented with a
concentration on the safety issues. The methodologies
will be compared in order to summarize their merits and
limitations.