شماره ركورد كنفرانس :
3770
عنوان مقاله :
Impact Behavior of Aluminum Composite Laminates: Architectural Lamination and Interfacial Bonding
پديدآورندگان :
Hosseini Monazzah A a_hosseinimonazzah@sbu.ac.ir Assistant Professor, Faculty of Mechanical Energy Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, A.C., Tehran, Iran , Bagheri R Professor, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran , Seyed Reihani S. M. Professor,, Department of Materials Science and Engineering Sharif University of Technology Tehran Iran
كليدواژه :
Composite Laminates , Interfacial Bonding , Plastic Deformation , Impact Energy.
عنوان كنفرانس :
چهارمين كنفرانس بين المللي دو سالانه مكانيك جامدات تجربي
چكيده فارسي :
In the recent research, impact energy absorption and fracture behavior of aluminum
composite laminates having different interfacial bonding in addition of discrepancy in
architectural layer arrangement have been studied under dynamic loading. Doing this, two
similar laminates, i.e.: Al6061-5vol.% SiC/Al1050/Al6061-5vol.% SiC (L(C5)) and
Al6061-10vol.%SiC/Al1050/Al6061-10vol.% SiC (L(C10)), as well as one dissimilar
layered structures, Al6061-5vol.%SiC/Al1050/Al6061-10vol.%SiC (L(C5/C10)), were
fabricated by means of hot roll-bonding with applying different strains of 39%, 51%, and
63%. The results of energy absorption indicate that, not only the impact energy of
laminates depends on the volume fraction of composite lamellas, and the interfacial
bonding of metal/composite layers but also the arrangement of layers governs energy
absorption. It was found that the impact behavior of similar composite laminates were
decreased by increasing interfacial adhesion. In these cases the length of delamination, as
well as, superior deformability of Al1050 inter-layer were introduced as two micromechanism of the fracture under dynamic loading. On the contrary, in dissimilar
laminates the trend of energy absorption was ascending with rolling strain, and did not
adhere rule of mixture. It was found that in the later laminates, the impact results at lowest
rolling reduction was close to LC(10) laminate rolled via minimum strain, while in the
most adhesive laminate, the value of energy absorption was inclined to L(C5) sample with
63% strain. It is notable that, in the dissimilar laminates, besides two previous fracture
micro-mechanism, the arrangement of composites layers control the fracture behavior.