Organization of Gatekeeping and Mental Framework in the System of Representation and Hierarchical Relational Structures of the Modern Society

Environments support our contextual interactions for semantic interpretation which requires contextual components. Critical discourse analysis as a type of social practice provides accounts for the production, internal structure, and overall organization of texts. It reveals how linguistic choices enable speakers to manipulate the realizations of agency and power in the representation of action to produce particular meanings which are not always explicit for all listeners. In most interactions, the users of language bring with them different linguistic repertoires which are closely related to social positioning. The present study examines the relationship between language and ideology and explores how such a relationship is represented in the analysis of spoken text and to show how declarative knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and ideology act and perform in the representation of macrostructures following Van Djik s (2004) model of critical dimension of discourse analysis. Individualized interviews were conducted to determine the way in which spoken discourse involves jointly constructed interactions which shows variation between formal and casual speech reflecting speaker roles. Results indicate that communication skills are essential to social interaction and contribute to coherent discourse. Thus identifying relational processes and the role of participants in the organization of conversation is so vital. It was concluded that features of situation affect participants perceptions and their conscious behavioral decisions. Different cultures present different sets of linguistic and semantic constraints and extract social meaning from speech which is signaled in different languages traced by discourse features.