Author/Authors :
Nicosia، نويسنده , , Kristina and Daaram، نويسنده , , Suhrudh and Edelman، نويسنده , , Ben and Gedrich، نويسنده , , Lev and He، نويسنده , , Eric and McNeilly، نويسنده , , Sarah and Shenoy، نويسنده , , Vishnu and Velagapudi، نويسنده , , Akhil and Wu، نويسنده , , Walter and Zhang، نويسنده , , Luna and Barvalia، نويسنده , , Aneri and Bokka، نويسنده , , Veena and Chan، نويسنده , , Brian and Chiu، نويسنده , , Jennifer and Dh، نويسنده ,
Latin Abstract :
Over the course of a school year, a high school biology class and a local watershed partnership worked together to design a study to determine the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a local degraded watershed. With research control given to the teacher and her classroom as part of their in-class honors biology curriculum, the result was a student designed/written, and professionally structured, research manuscript. The aim of this collaboration was to: (1) integrate quantitative social science into the K–12 science curriculum to foster learning about the nature of social science investigation in a real world context; (2) create a community-based science partnership; and (3) generate social science data useful for decision-making that could withstand scientific peer review. In this commentary, we present the written product of the classroomsʹ work to illustrate the type of information that can be generated by a participatory science education program, along with a reflection from the students and project researchers about opportunities and barriers to conducting authentic social science research in K–12 classrooms.
NaturalLanguageKeyword :
ecosystem services , Contingent valuation , Coastal watersheds , Environmental education , Citizen science , K–12