Author/Authors :
AKGÜNDÜZ, Said Nuri Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi - İlahiyat Fakültesi, Turkey
Title Of Article :
TWO DIFFERENT APPROACH OF “MASLAHA” IN TWENTIETH CENTURY -The Comparison Between Mustafa al-Shalabi’s and Ramazan al-Bouti’s “Maslaha” Understanding
شماره ركورد :
39799
Abstract :
The principle of “maslaha” is, one of the concepts that have had important roles at the rise anddevelopment of “fikh=Islamic jurisprudence”. This principle has occupied a place in the basic rulesof schools of fikh more or less. Especially in the twentieth century, too many books and papers were written on this principle; among of them, Shalabi’s Ta’lîlul-Ahkâm and Bouti’s Davâbıt had animportant place. Shalabi dedicated a part of his work, and Bouti all of his book, to this subject. Theauthors made considerable assessments on definition, place, criteria and borders of “maslaha”.Through this paper, I’m going to present some evaluations and determinations concerning withShalabi’s and Bouti’s attitudes towards the topic of “maslaha” and their approachs to this matter.
From Page :
41
NaturalLanguageKeyword :
Bouti , Fikh (Islamic Jurisprudence) , Maslaha (Public Interest) , Shalabi
JournalTitle :
Dergiabant
To Page :
51
Link To Document :
بازگشت