• DocumentCode
    1010301
  • Title

    Magnet cooling economics

  • Author

    Parmer, J.F. ; Liggett, M.W.

  • Author_Institution
    General Dynamics Convair Division, San Diego, California
  • Volume
    21
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    1985
  • fDate
    3/1/1985 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1056
  • Lastpage
    1059
  • Abstract
    The recommendation to use superfluid helium II in superconducting magnet design has become more prevalent in recent years. Advanced fusion reactor studies such as the Mirror Advanced Reactor Study recently completed by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) have based superconducting magnet design on the use of He II because of reduced magnet volume, improved stability characteristics, or increased superconductor critical current at fields above 9 Tesla. This paper reports the results of a study to determine the capital costs ($/watt) and the operating costs (watts/watt) of refrigeration systems in the 1.8K to 300K temperature range. The cost data is applied to a 1.8K magnet that is subject to neutronic heating wherein the magnet case is insulated from the winding so that the case can be cooled at a higher temperature (less costly) than the winding. The life cycle cost (capital plus operating) is reported as a function of coil temperature and insulation thickness. In some cases there is an optimum, least-cost thickness. In addition, the basic data can be used to evaluate the impact of neutron shielding effectiveness trades on the combined shield, magnet, cryorefrigerator, and operating life cycle cost.
  • Keywords
    Nuclear fusion; Superconducting magnets; Cooling; Costs; Fusion reactor design; Fusion reactors; Helium; Inductors; Insulation; Mirrors; Superconducting magnets; Temperature;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMAG.1985.1063823
  • Filename
    1063823