• DocumentCode
    1020185
  • Title

    Deconvolution-Homomorphic or Predictive?

  • Author

    Treitel, Sven ; Robinson, Enders A.

  • Author_Institution
    Research Center, Amoco Production Co., Tusla, OK.
  • Volume
    15
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1977
  • Firstpage
    11
  • Lastpage
    13
  • Abstract
    Both the methods of predictive as well as homomorphic deconvolution require an assumption about the phase characteristic of the source pulse. In the case of predictive deconvolution, the difficulty lies in the specification of the dispersive all-pass filter that converts the minimum-phase pulse estimate into the "correct" pulse estimate. In the case of homomorphic deconvolution, the difficulty arises in the specification of the cepstral cutoff quefrencies that produce the "correct" pulse estimate. Both approaches work up to a point, but neither yields a complete solution to the seismic-source pulse-estimation problem.
  • Keywords
    Convolution; Deconvolution; Delay; Geophysics computing; Geoscience; Natural gas; Petroleum; Production; Reflection; Reverberation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience Electronics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9413
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGE.1977.294508
  • Filename
    4071824