• DocumentCode
    1025786
  • Title

    In defense of PowerPoint

  • Author

    Holmes, Neville

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Comput., Tasmania Univ., Hobart, Tas., Australia
  • Volume
    37
  • Issue
    7
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    7/1/2004 12:00:00 AM
  • Lastpage
    99
  • Abstract
    Some minor computing issues become major when repeatedly made public. The denigration of PowerPoint is such an issue, one that, like influenza, seems to come in seasonal waves. PowerPoint is no more responsible for bad presentations. Computing professionals who blame their machinery for their failures set a bad example for computer users already prone to using the computer as a scapegoat. Professionals, not the software packages they use, are responsible for the presentations they make. Countering silly arguments about PowerPoint requires a full appreciation of presentation technology and of the uses to which it might be put. PowerPoint is just presentation technology´s latest iteration and will eventually be replaced by something else.
  • Keywords
    business graphics; software packages; technical presentation; PowerPoint; presentation technology; software package; Atmosphere; Educational institutions; Engineering profession; HTML; Proposals; Sleep; Software packages; Writing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Computer
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9162
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MC.2004.54
  • Filename
    1310251