DocumentCode
1038223
Title
Closer spacing of geostationary satellites through adaptive nulling at the ground terminal
Author
Burrows, Michael L.
Author_Institution
Lincoln Lab., MIT, Lexington, MA USA
Volume
35
Issue
7
fYear
1987
fDate
7/1/1987 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
870
Lastpage
873
Abstract
The results of a preliminary study suggest that interference to the downlink of one geostationary satellite from that of another satellite in the adjacent orbital slot can be substantially reduced by the addition of a simple adaptive nulling system to the ground terminal antenna. Alternatively, the nulling system allows the satellites to be spaced significantly closer together with no increase in interference. Significant improvement is obtained with simple open-loop antenna pointing. The improvement is greater, however, if the adaptive antenna automatically tracks the direction of the desired source. For a dish antenna with a single receiving feed horn, the extra hardware required to provide the adaptive capability consists of two more receiving feed horns, a variable weighting device for each of the feed lines (now three in number) and the adaptive control electronics. An example shows that the minimum spacing between one satellite and an interfering satellite, consistent with certain assumed operating requirements, could be reduced from the
needed for a simple single beam antenna to
, for the adaptive antenna using open loop pointing, to as little as
, for the adaptive antenna using automatic pointing. The adaptive hulling also provides essentially the same protection against downlink interference from the two other satellites occupying the slots on both sides of the satellite serving the terminal. The three degrees of freedom of the postulated nulling system, however, cannot cope with three or more nearby interfering satellites.
needed for a simple single beam antenna to
, for the adaptive antenna using open loop pointing, to as little as
, for the adaptive antenna using automatic pointing. The adaptive hulling also provides essentially the same protection against downlink interference from the two other satellites occupying the slots on both sides of the satellite serving the terminal. The three degrees of freedom of the postulated nulling system, however, cannot cope with three or more nearby interfering satellites.Keywords
Adaptive arrays; Multibeam antennas; Satellite communication, earth terminals; Adaptive arrays; Adaptive control; Adaptive systems; Directive antennas; Downlink; Feeds; Horn antennas; Interference; Satellite antennas; Slot antennas;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-926X
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TAP.1987.1144185
Filename
1144185
Link To Document