Title :
Magnetic Sensors for Bioassay: HTS SQUIDs or GMRs?
Author :
Carr, Chris ; Matlachov, Andrei N. ; Sandin, Henrik ; Espy, Michelle A. ; Kraus, Robert H., Jr.
Author_Institution :
Los Alamos Nat. Lab., Los Alamos
fDate :
6/1/2007 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
In this paper we compare the detection of magnetic microparticles by HTS SQUIDs and GMR sensors. Our prototype system uses a HTS SQUID array insulated/isolated from a nonmagnetic tube in which the sample flows at room temperature. This necessarily results in a liftoff between sensor and sample in the range of 2 mm. While HTS SQUIDs typically have an intrinsic noise sensitivity that is at least two orders of magnitude better than conventional GMR sensors (~ 1 pTradicHz for washer SQUIDs compared to ~ 100 pTradicHz for the best commercial GMRs), the dipole like response of a magnetic microparticle in flow is such that this difference in noise performance can be compensated for by the reduction in standoff (order of 0.2 mm) when using a magnetoresistive sensor. Here we detail the two different approaches, present comparative results and discuss the relative merits of each setup.
Keywords :
SQUID magnetometers; biomagnetism; giant magnetoresistance; high-temperature superconductors; magnetic particles; magnetic sensors; nanoparticles; superconducting arrays; GMR sensors; HTS SQUIDs; bioassay; magnetic microparticles; magnetic sensors; magnetoresistive sensor; noise performance; noise sensitivity; nonmagnetic tube; standoff; washer SQUIDs; Biosensors; Giant magnetoresistance; High temperature superconductors; Insulation; Magnetic noise; Magnetic sensors; Micromagnetics; Noise reduction; Prototypes; SQUIDs; Bioassay; giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensors; magnetic microparticles; superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs);
Journal_Title :
Applied Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TASC.2007.897369