DocumentCode :
1074234
Title :
Contrast agent response to chirp reversal: simulations, optical observations, and acoustical verification
Author :
Novell, Anthony ; Der Meer, Sven ; Versluis, Michel ; Jong, N. ; Bouakaz, Ayache
Author_Institution :
CNRS, Tours
Volume :
56
Issue :
6
fYear :
2009
fDate :
6/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
1199
Lastpage :
1206
Abstract :
Active response of a microbubble is characterized by its resonance behavior where the microbubble might oscillate after the excitation waveform has been turned off. We investigate in this paper an excitation approach based on this resonance phenomenon using chirps. The technique, called chirp reversal, consists in transmitting a first excitation signal, the up-sweep chirp (UPF) of increasing frequency with time, and a second excitation signal, the down-sweep (DNF) that is a replica of the first signal, but time reversed with a sweep of decreasing frequency with time. Simulations using a modified Rayleigh-Plesset equation were carried out to determine bubble response to chirp reversal. In addition, optical observations and acoustical measurements were carried out to corroborate the theoretical findings. Results of simulations show differences between bubblesiquest oscillations in response to up-sweep and down-sweep chirps mainly for transmitted center frequencies above the bubbles resonance frequency. Bubbles that are at resonance or far away from resonance engender identical responses. From the optical data, the larger bubbles showed different dynamics when up-sweep or down-sweep chirps were transmitted. Smaller bubbles (< 2 mum diameter) appear to be less sensitive to frequency sweep at 1.7 MHz center frequency. However, driven at a higher center frequency, smaller bubbles tend to be more sensitive. These results were confirmed through the acoustical measurements. We concluded that simulations and experimental data show that significant differences might be observed between bubblesiquest responses to UPF and DNF chirps. We demonstrate in this study that, for an optimal use of chirp reversal, the transmit frequency should be higher than the resonance frequency of the contrast microbubbles.
Keywords :
acoustic resonance; acoustic variables measurement; bubbles; fluid oscillations; nonlinear acoustics; active response; chirp reversal; contrast agent response; down-sweep chirp; excitation waveform; microbubble; modified Rayleigh-Plesset equation; nonlinear acoustic properties; resonance behavior; up-sweep chirp; Acoustic measurements; Chirp; Equations; Optical sensors; Resonance; Resonant frequency; Acoustics; Algorithms; Contrast Media; Image Enhancement; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0885-3010
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1161
Filename :
5075102
Link To Document :
بازگشت