DocumentCode
1085462
Title
Reply to "Comparison of thermal-shunt and flip-chip HBT thermal impedances: comment on novel HBT with reduced thermal impedance"
Author
Hill, D. ; Khatibzadeh, A. ; Liu, W. ; Kim, T. ; Ikalainen, P.
Volume
6
Issue
8
fYear
1996
Firstpage
298
Abstract
We would like to take this opportunity to respond to the above comment by Jenkins et al., who raised some good points that we would like to address concerning out letter. However, the primary point of their comment is to question whether flip-chip heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBT´s) offer any advantage over the thermal-shunt technology developed by Bayraktaroglu et al. This question has been answered unambiguously in a recent report by Bayraktaroglu et al. that directly compared the thermal resistance of thermal-shunt and flip-chip devices. In this report, flip-chip devices on the average had 37% lower thermal resistance compared to conventional thermally shunted devices of similar size.
Keywords
Electromagnetic heating; Fingers; Heterojunction bipolar transistors; Impedance; Instruments; MMICs; Microwave devices; Temperature; Thermal conductivity; Thermal resistance;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1051-8207
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/75.508559
Filename
508559
Link To Document