• DocumentCode
    1095824
  • Title

    Optimum 3-step step-stress tests

  • Author

    Khamis, Imad H. ; Higgins, James J.

  • Author_Institution
    Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, USA
  • Volume
    45
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    1996
  • fDate
    6/1/1996 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    341
  • Lastpage
    345
  • Abstract
    Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life testing plans have practical limitations. They highly depend upon the assumption of a linear relationship between stress and time-to-failure and use only two extreme stresses that can cause irrelevant failure modes. Thus, 3-step plans are preferable. In this paper, the authors derive the optimum quadratic plan and propose and evaluate a 3-step test plan, the compound linear, as an alternative to the optimum simple step-stress plan and optimum quadratic plan. The compound linear plan is better than two compromise plans proposed for constant stress testing and nearly as good as a proposed optimum compromise plan, the advantage being its simplicity. A small sample-size study shows that the efficiency of the test plan is not appreciably affected by the sample size, so that the asymptotic results are a good indication of the performance in sample sizes encountered in practice
  • Keywords
    failure analysis; life testing; maximum likelihood estimation; optimisation; probability; accelerated life testing plans; asymptotic results; compound linear test plan; constant stress testing; efficiency; irrelevant failure modes; optimum three-step step-stress tests; performance; sample size; time-to-failure; Acceleration; Costs; Life estimation; Life testing; Materials testing; Maximum likelihood estimation; Mean square error methods; Stress; Uncertainty; Weibull distribution;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9529
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/24.510823
  • Filename
    510823