Author_Institution :
Brookhaven Nat. Lab., Upton, NY, USA
Abstract :
In the analysis of magnetic flux creep experiments, it is assumed that, at a given temperature, the pinning energy, which must be overcome by thermal activation, depends on the magnetic induction and its gradient by U(B,ΔB)≅Up(B)[1-(ΔB/ΔBmax)] n, where Up is the pinning well depth and ΔB max corresponds to the critical current density with no thermal activation. Customarily, n is assumed to be unity, and any unusual temperature dependence of Up is then ascribed to a distribution of well depths. However, realistic assumptions about the shape of the pinning potential yield 3/2≲n≲2, which yields an apparent distribution of well depths in the conventional analysis. Simple models are used to illustrate the characteristics of these two quite different origins for the apparent temperature dependence of well depth obtained from magnetic flux creep rates
Keywords :
critical current density (superconductivity); flux creep; flux pinning; critical current density; energy distribution; magnetic flux creep; magnetic induction; pinning energy; pinning potential; pinning well depth; potential shape; temperature dependence; thermal activation; Creep; Energy measurement; Laboratories; Magnetic analysis; Magnetic flux; Shape; Superconducting magnets; Superconductivity; Temperature dependence; Type II superconductors;