Title :
Knowledge-based interpretation of MR brain images
Author :
Sonka, Milan ; Tadikonda, Satish K. ; Collins, Steve M.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Iowa Univ., Iowa City, IA, USA
fDate :
8/1/1996 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
The authors have developed a method for fully automated segmentation and labeling of 17 neuroanatomic structures such as thalamus, caudate nucleus, ventricular system, etc. in magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. The authors´ method is based on a hypothesize-and-verify principle and uses a genetic algorithm (GA) optimization technique to generate and evaluate image interpretation hypotheses in a feedback loop. The authors´ method was trained in 20 individual T1-weighted MR images. Observer-defined contours of neuroanatomic structures were used as a priori knowledge. The method´s performance was validated in eight MR images by comparison to observer-defined independent standards. The GA-based image interpretation method correctly interpreted neuroanatomic structures in all images from the test set. Computer-identified and observer-defined neuroanatomic structure areas correlated very well (r=0.99, y=0,95x-2.1). Border positioning errors were small, with a root mean square (rms) border positioning error of 1.5±0.6 pixels. The authors´ GA-based image interpretation method represents a novel approach to image interpretation and has been shown to produce accurate labeling of neuroanatomic structures in a set of MR brain images
Keywords :
biomedical NMR; brain; image segmentation; medical image processing; MR brain images; T1-weighted MR images; a priori knowledge; border positioning errors; caudate nucleus; feedback loop; fully automated segmentation; image interpretation hypotheses; knowledge-based interpretation; magnetic resonance brain images; medical diagnostic imaging; neuroanatomic structures; observer-defined contours; positioning error; thalamus; ventricular system; Brain; Computer errors; Feedback loop; Genetic algorithms; Image generation; Image segmentation; Labeling; Magnetic resonance; Optimization methods; Testing;
Journal_Title :
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on