DocumentCode :
11139
Title :
Real-Time, Simultaneous Myoelectric Control Using Force and Position-Based Training Paradigms
Author :
Ameri, Alireza ; Scheme, Erik J. ; Kamavuako, Ernest N. ; Englehart, Kevin B. ; Parker, Philip A.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
Volume :
61
Issue :
2
fYear :
2014
fDate :
Feb. 2014
Firstpage :
279
Lastpage :
287
Abstract :
In this paper, the simultaneous real-time control of multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) for myoelectric systems is investigated. The goal of this study, in which ten able-bodied subjects participated, was to directly compare three control paradigms of constrained (force targeted), unconstrained (position targeted) and resisted unconstrained (position targeted) limb contractions. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were trained for simultaneous myoelectric control of the three degrees of freedom (DOFs) (wrist flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and pronation-supination) using mirrored bilateral contractions. In the resisted unconstrained experiment, some resistance to movement was provided using flexible wrist braces in order to increase the required level of muscle activation. The force, in constrained experiments, and position, in unconstrained and resisted unconstrained experiments, were measured. The three protocols were compared off-line using estimation accuracies (R2) and online using a real-time computer-based target acquisition test. The constrained control paradigm outperformed the unconstrained method in the abduction-adduction DOF (Rconstrained2 = 90.8 ± 0.6, Runconstrained2 = 85.6 ± 1.6) and pronation-supination DOF ( Rconstrained2 = 88.5 ± 0.9, Runconstrained2 = 82.3 ± 1.6), but no significant difference was found in the flexion-extension DOF. The constrained control method outperformed unconstrained control in two real-time testing metrics including completion time and path efficiency. The constrained method results, however, were not significantly different than those of the resisted unconstrained method (with braces) in both off-line and real-time tests. This suggests that the quality of control using constrained and unconstrained contraction-based myoelectric schemes is not appreciably different when using comparable l- vels of muscle activation.
Keywords :
electromyography; force control; medical control systems; neural nets; position control; able bodied subjects; artificial neural networks; estimation accuracy; force based training paradigm; force targeted limb contraction; mirrored bilateral contraction; muscle activation; position based training paradigm; position targeted limb contraction; real time myoelectric control; simultaneous myoelectric control; wrist abduction-adduction; wrist flexion-extension; wrist pronation-supination; Electromyography; Force; Joints; Protocols; Real-time systems; Training; Wrist; Constrained contractions; electromyogram; myoelectric control; powered prostheses; unconstrained contractions;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9294
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TBME.2013.2281595
Filename :
6600957
Link To Document :
بازگشت