• DocumentCode
    1132082
  • Title

    Neuroinspired Architecture for Robust Classifier Fusion of Multisensor Imagery

  • Author

    Bogdanov, Andrey V.

  • Author_Institution
    Ruhr- Univ. Bochum, Bochum
  • Volume
    46
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    5/1/2008 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1467
  • Lastpage
    1487
  • Abstract
    Two new algorithms for robust and fault-tolerant classifier combination are presented. The attractor dynamics (AD) algorithm models some properties of sensory integration in the central nervous system and is based on the application of the dynamical systems for classifier fusion. The classifier masking (CM) algorithm is a nonneural version of the AD algorithm based on finding intersecting classifier intervals. Both of the proposed algorithms employ the idea of consensus among individual classifiers. The individual classifiers have been trained using resampled feature sets. They fuse the information from advanced synthetic aperture radar, medium resolution imaging spectrometer, and advanced along track scanning radiometer envisat satellite sensors for the improved sea ice classification. The results of our experiments show that training and combing the individual classifier outputs in a multiple classifier system significantly improve the robustness and the fault tolerance of the classification system as compared to the single classifier combining all sources of information. The robustness of the single classifier has been largely reduced in cases of single sensor failures (87.9 % in normal conditions versus 64.8% and 66.1% for two artificially corrupted data sets), whereas the CM algorithm is more tolerant to the sensor and preprocessing errors (86.4% in normal conditions versus 78.9% and 73.6% for two artificially corrupted data sets). The performance of the CM algorithm is superior to those of the simple multiple classifier combination strategies based on classifier averaging and majority voting (78.9% versus 70.9% and 69.5%, respectively) because the AD and CM algorithms are able to discard the corrupted classifier outputs based on classifier agreement and, in fact, represent hybrid approaches combining the properties of classifier averaging and classifier selection methods.
  • Keywords
    geophysical signal processing; image classification; image fusion; neural nets; oceanographic techniques; radar imaging; remote sensing by radar; sea ice; synthetic aperture radar; Advanced Along Track Scanning Radiometer; Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar; Envisat satellite sensors; Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer; attractor dynamics algorithm models; classifier averaging methods; classifier masking algorithm; classifier selection methods; fault-tolerant classifier combination; multisensor imagery; neural networks; neuroinspired architecture; nonneural version; robust classifier fusion; sea ice classification; sensory integration; Central nervous system; Fault tolerance; Fuses; Heuristic algorithms; Image sensors; Radar tracking; Radiometry; Robustness; Satellite broadcasting; Sensor fusion; Attractor dynamics; Laptev sea; classifier masking; fault-tolerant classifier combination; multiple classifier systems; neural networks; remote sensing image classification; sea ice;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.2008.916214
  • Filename
    4490050