DocumentCode :
1134678
Title :
Smaller is better? [micromotors and electric drives]
Author :
Chapman, Patrick L. ; Krein, Philip T.
Author_Institution :
Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
fYear :
2003
Firstpage :
62
Lastpage :
67
Abstract :
Some fundamental constraints on the performance of micromotor technology have been discussed. Several aspects of performance were explored, including energy density, force density, size, constraints on motor-drive circuitry, motor topologies, and friction. Analysis shows that electrostatic machines have advantages as microfabrication processes achieve finer resolution, and, in fact, can exceed the energy and force density capabilities of conventional magnetic machines at small enough scales. Major thrusts for electric drive theory to be applied are in control, topology optimization, and machine testing.
Keywords :
force; micromotors; motor drives; MEMS; control; electric drive theory; electrostatic machines; energy density; force density; friction; machine testing; microfabrication processes; micromotor technology; motor topologies; motor-drive circuitry constraints; performance; size; topology optimization; Air gaps; Electric breakdown; Electrostatics; Energy storage; Magnetic fields; Magnetic flux; Magnetic materials; Micromotors; Reluctance motors; Saturation magnetization;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Industry Applications Magazine, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1077-2618
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/MIA.2003.1176460
Filename :
1176460
Link To Document :
بازگشت