• DocumentCode
    1134678
  • Title

    Smaller is better? [micromotors and electric drives]

  • Author

    Chapman, Patrick L. ; Krein, Philip T.

  • Author_Institution
    Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA
  • Volume
    9
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2003
  • Firstpage
    62
  • Lastpage
    67
  • Abstract
    Some fundamental constraints on the performance of micromotor technology have been discussed. Several aspects of performance were explored, including energy density, force density, size, constraints on motor-drive circuitry, motor topologies, and friction. Analysis shows that electrostatic machines have advantages as microfabrication processes achieve finer resolution, and, in fact, can exceed the energy and force density capabilities of conventional magnetic machines at small enough scales. Major thrusts for electric drive theory to be applied are in control, topology optimization, and machine testing.
  • Keywords
    force; micromotors; motor drives; MEMS; control; electric drive theory; electrostatic machines; energy density; force density; friction; machine testing; microfabrication processes; micromotor technology; motor topologies; motor-drive circuitry constraints; performance; size; topology optimization; Air gaps; Electric breakdown; Electrostatics; Energy storage; Magnetic fields; Magnetic flux; Magnetic materials; Micromotors; Reluctance motors; Saturation magnetization;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Industry Applications Magazine, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1077-2618
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MIA.2003.1176460
  • Filename
    1176460