DocumentCode
1134678
Title
Smaller is better? [micromotors and electric drives]
Author
Chapman, Patrick L. ; Krein, Philip T.
Author_Institution
Illinois Univ., Urbana, IL, USA
Volume
9
Issue
1
fYear
2003
Firstpage
62
Lastpage
67
Abstract
Some fundamental constraints on the performance of micromotor technology have been discussed. Several aspects of performance were explored, including energy density, force density, size, constraints on motor-drive circuitry, motor topologies, and friction. Analysis shows that electrostatic machines have advantages as microfabrication processes achieve finer resolution, and, in fact, can exceed the energy and force density capabilities of conventional magnetic machines at small enough scales. Major thrusts for electric drive theory to be applied are in control, topology optimization, and machine testing.
Keywords
force; micromotors; motor drives; MEMS; control; electric drive theory; electrostatic machines; energy density; force density; friction; machine testing; microfabrication processes; micromotor technology; motor topologies; motor-drive circuitry constraints; performance; size; topology optimization; Air gaps; Electric breakdown; Electrostatics; Energy storage; Magnetic fields; Magnetic flux; Magnetic materials; Micromotors; Reluctance motors; Saturation magnetization;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Industry Applications Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1077-2618
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MIA.2003.1176460
Filename
1176460
Link To Document