• DocumentCode
    1170605
  • Title

    Distance learning versus being there

  • Author

    Reisman, Sorel

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf. Syst. & Decision Sci., California State Univ., Fullerton, CA, USA
  • Volume
    6
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2004
  • Firstpage
    8
  • Lastpage
    10
  • Abstract
    The Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported that "the boom in educational technology has not lived up to its promise of revolutionizing the classroom and making higher education more profitable" (Carnevale, 2004). The Chronicle later highlighted a study showing that "while the innovations have made courses more convenient, the spending [on IT in the classroom] has yet to have a large impact on learning" (Young, 2004). On the other hand, this same article states that "of the students surveyed, 76.1% said their experience using a course-management system was positive or very positive, with only 6.6% saying it was negative or very negative (17.3% were neutral on the issue)." So how effective is online versus traditional instruction? The author\´s personal observation is that his online students performed about as well as my traditional students on all their assignments, tests, and exercises. Different types of practice materials were available to the different classes, each appropriate to the teaching or learning situation in use. However, despite studies on instructional methods, there has never been a definitive answer to the question.
  • Keywords
    distance learning; educational courses; educational technology; course-management system; distance learning; educational innovations; educational technology; information technology; instructional methods; online instruction; Computer aided instruction; Education; Employment; Internet; Resumes; Scheduling; Teleworking; Testing; Time factors;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    IT Professional
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1520-9202
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MITP.2004.58
  • Filename
    1362616