• DocumentCode
    1174780
  • Title

    Broadband minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging

  • Author

    Holfort, Iben Kraglund ; Gran, Fredrik ; Jensen, JØrgen Arendt

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng., Tech. Univ. of Denmark, Lyngby
  • Volume
    56
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    2/1/2009 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    314
  • Lastpage
    325
  • Abstract
    A minimum variance (MV) approach for nearfield beamforming of broadband data is proposed. The approach is implemented in the frequency domain, and it provides a set of adapted, complex apodization weights for each frequency subband. The performance of the proposed MV beamformer is tested on simulated data obtained using Field II. The method is validated using synthetic aperture data and data obtained from a plane wave emission. Data for 13 point targets and a circular cyst with a radius of 5 mm are simulated. The performance of the MV beamformer is compared with delay-and-sum (DS) using boxcar weights and Hanning weights and is quantified by the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the peak-side-lobe level (PSL). Single emission {DS boxcar, DS Hanning, MV} provide a PSL of {-16, -36, -49} dB and a FWHM of {0.79, 1.33, 0.08} mm. Using all 128 emissions, {DS boxcar, DS Hanning, MV} provides a PSL of {-32, -49, -65} dB, and a FWHM of {0.63, 0.97, 0.08} mm. The contrast of the beamformed single emission responses of the circular cyst was calculated as {-18, -37, -40} dB. The simulations have shown that the frequency subband MV beamformer provides a significant increase in lateral resolution compared with DS, even when using considerably fewer emissions. An increase in resolution is seen when using only one single emission. Furthermore, the effect of steering vector errors is investigated. The steering vector errors are investigated by applying an error of the sound speed estimate to the ultrasound data. As the error increases, it is seen that the MV beamformer is not as robust compared with the DS beamformer with boxcar and Hanning weights. Nevertheless, it is noted that the DS does not outperform the MV beamformer. For errors of 2% and 4% of the correct value, the FWHM are {0.81, 1.25, 0.34} mm and {0.89, 1.44, 0.46} mm, respectively.
  • Keywords
    array signal processing; biomedical ultrasonics; delay estimation; image resolution; medical image processing; broadband minimum variance beamforming; circular cyst; delay-and-sum Hanning weights; delay-and-sum boxcar weights; frequency subband minimum variance beamformer; full width half maximum; lateral resolution; medical ultrasound imaging; peak-side-lobe level; sound speed estimate; steering vector errors; Acoustic sensors; Array signal processing; Biomedical imaging; Delay estimation; Narrowband; Propagation delay; Sensor arrays; Signal processing; Spatial filters; Ultrasonic imaging; Algorithms; Computer Simulation; Cysts; Fourier Analysis; Image Enhancement; Phantoms, Imaging; Reproducibility of Results; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Ultrasonography;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-3010
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1040
  • Filename
    4787183