An evaluation of alternative load measurement frameworks for resource planning

Three alternative frameworks for counting loads and resources to be used for resource planning purposes are reviewed, and their implications are evaluated using an example taken from a recent planning exercise. They are: the traditional approach, which focuses on utility sales to ultimate customers; the California Energy Commission (CEC) approach, which includes more self-generation and conservation and load management (C&LM) programs; and the inclusive approach, which adds savings from all existing programs in both historic and future periods. The three approaches are applied to an actual case. The author recommends a compromise between the current CEC framework and the inclusive framework as the best balance of benefits and costs for resource planning purposes