DocumentCode :
1183460
Title :
Why no additive hazards models?
Author :
Newby, Martin
Author_Institution :
Graduate Sch. of Ind. Sci., Eindhoven Univ. of Technol., Netherlands
Volume :
43
Issue :
3
fYear :
1994
fDate :
9/1/1994 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
484
Lastpage :
488
Abstract :
The intuitively attractive additive hazards model is compared with the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models. The lack of identifiability limits the use of the model and prevents the application of regression versions using covariates. Fortunately, data analysis based on nonhomogeneous Poisson processes or on proportional hazards is likely to yield most of the information available in the data, even though they: (1) do not necessarily represent the underlying process; and (2) even seem unlikely in certain situations. In particular, proportional hazards modeling appears very robust and requires few assumptions
Keywords :
failure analysis; probability; reliability theory; stochastic processes; accelerated failure time model; additive hazards model; data analysis; nonhomogeneous Poisson processes; proportional hazards model; reliability; robust; underlying process; Acceleration; Aging; Data analysis; Failure analysis; Hazards; Probability; Risk analysis; Robustness; Statistical analysis; Time measurement;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9529
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/24.326450
Filename :
326450
Link To Document :
بازگشت