Title :
Comments, with reply, on "Electric field sensors in electromagnetic sounding" by Wu Xiao Wu and David V. Thiel
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ, USA
Abstract :
The conclusion by W.X. Wu and D.V. Thiel (see ibid., vol.27, p.24-27, Jan. 1989) that a horizontal, insulated, ungrounded antenna is a dependable probe for the horizontal E fields is questioned. It is shown that the horizontal insulated antenna should be grounded at the end points to provide a reliable measurement of the actual surface impedance in conjunction with the measurement of the horizontal magnetic field. Wu and Thiel´s experimental data supports this contention. In their first reply the original authors offer arguments and counterexamples to further support their case. In further comments J.R. Wait states that he has not altered his views on the matter as expounded in the letter. In a second reply Wu and Thiel elaborate on experimental details omitted in the original work, which it is hoped will clarify the previous explanations they presented.<>
Keywords :
geophysical equipment; geophysical prospecting; terrestrial electricity; electric field sensors; electromagnetic sounding; geophysical equipment; horizontal E fields; horizontal insulated antenna; magnetic field; prospecting; surface impedance; ungrounded antenna; Acoustic sensors; Directive antennas; Earth; Electromagnetic fields; Impedance; Insulation; Magnetic field measurement; Receiving antennas; Transmitting antennas; Voltage;
Journal_Title :
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on