DocumentCode :
1289770
Title :
Realities of Biomedical Product Liability Suits and the Role of Junk Science: From Breast Implants to TASER Weapons
Author :
Kroll, M.W.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Volume :
3
Issue :
5
fYear :
2012
Firstpage :
27
Lastpage :
32
Abstract :
In the summer of 2006, manufacturers of a simple respirator mask costing US$1 told the U.S. Congress that Americans would find a shortage of these masks if there was another flu pandemic. The reason for this was that suing the makers of these dust masks became a major business for trial lawyers. By 2006, there had been more than 326,000 lawsuits filed. It has been reported in many cases that the law firms worked with cooperative physicians and contracted with X-ray labs to screen individuals for lung problems. If an individual had an abnormal lung X-ray and claimed that they had used a certain brand of respirator and the manufacturer was still in business and had economic resourcesa lawsuit was filed. Some manufacturers went out of business while others simply stopped making the masks.
Keywords :
biological organs; biomedical equipment; gynaecology; lung; product liability; prosthetics; respiratory protection; weapons; TASER weapons; U.S. congress; abnormal lung X-ray labs; biomedical product liability suits; breast implants; cooperative physicians; dust masks; economic resources; flu pandemic; junk science; law firms; lawsuits filed; lung problems; respirator; simple respirator mask costing; trial lawyers; Autopsy; Diseases; Implants; Muscles; Pricing; Respiratory system; Adult; Animals; Biomedical Engineering; Breast Implants; Equipment and Supplies; Female; Humans; Liability, Legal; Male; United States; Ventricular Fibrillation; Weapons;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Pulse, IEEE
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
2154-2287
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/MPUL.2012.2205778
Filename :
6310141
Link To Document :
بازگشت