DocumentCode :
1303437
Title :
Joint Decoding of LDPC Codes and Finite-State Channels Via Linear-Programming
Author :
Kim, Byung-Hak ; Pfister, Henry D.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX, USA
Volume :
5
Issue :
8
fYear :
2011
Firstpage :
1563
Lastpage :
1576
Abstract :
This paper considers the joint-decoding problem for finite-state channels (FSCs) and low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. In the first part, the linear-programming (LP) decoder for binary linear codes is extended to perform joint-decoding of binary-input FSCs. In particular, we provide a rigorous definition of LP joint-decoding pseudo-codewords (JD-PCWs) that enables evaluation of the pairwise error probability between codewords and JD-PCWs in AWGN. This leads naturally to a provable upper bound on decoder failure probability. If the channel is a finite-state intersymbol interference channel, then the joint LP decoder also has the maximum-likelihood (ML) certificate property and all integer-valued solutions are codewords. In this case, the performance loss relative to ML decoding can be explained completely by fractional-valued JD-PCWs. After deriving these results, we discovered some elements were equivalent to earlier work by Flanagan on linear-programming receivers. In the second part, we develop an efficient iterative solver for the joint LP decoder discussed in the first part. In particular, we extend the approach of iterative approximate LP decoding, proposed by Vontobel and Koetter and analyzed by Burshtein, to this problem. By taking advantage of the dual-domain structure of the joint-decoding LP, we obtain a convergent iterative algorithm for joint LP decoding whose structure is similar to BCJR-based turbo equalization (TE). The result is a joint iterative decoder whose per-iteration complexity is similar to that of TE but whose performance is similar to that of joint LP decoding. The main advantage of this decoder is that it appears to provide the predictability and superior performance of joint LP decoding with the computational complexity of TE. One expected application is coding for magnetic storage where the required block-error rate is extremely low and system performance is difficult to verify by simulation.
Keywords :
AWGN channels; integer programming; linear programming; maximum likelihood decoding; parity check codes; probability; radiofrequency interference; turbo codes; AWGN; BCJR-based turbo equalization; JD-PCW; LDPC codes; LP joint-decoding pseudo-codewords; ML decoding; TE; binary-input FSC; block-error rate; computational complexity; decoder failure probability; finite-state channels; finite-state intersymbol interference channel; integer-valued solution; joint decoding; linear-programming decoder; low-density parity-check codes; maximum-likelihood certificate property; pairwise error probability; Intersymbol interference; Iterative decoding; Linear programming; Maximum likelihood decoding; Pairwise error probability; Parity check codes; BCJR algorithm; finite-state channels; joint-decoding; linear-programming (LP) decoding; low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes; turbo equalization;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Selected Topics in Signal Processing, IEEE Journal of
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
1932-4553
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/JSTSP.2011.2165525
Filename :
5993490
Link To Document :
بازگشت