• DocumentCode
    1324041
  • Title

    Feasibility Structure Modeling: An Effective Chaperone for Constrained Memetic Algorithms

  • Author

    Handoko, Stephanus Daniel ; Kwoh, Chee Keong ; Ong, Yew-Soon

  • Author_Institution
    Center for Comput. Intell., Nanyang Technol. Univ., Singapore, Singapore
  • Volume
    14
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2010
  • Firstpage
    740
  • Lastpage
    758
  • Abstract
    An important issue in designing memetic algorithms (MAs) is the choice of solutions in the population for local refinements, which becomes particularly crucial when solving computationally expensive problems. With single evaluation of the objective/constraint functions necessitating tremendous computational power and time, it is highly desirable to be able to focus search efforts on the regions where the global optimum is potentially located so as not to waste too many function evaluations. For constrained optimization, the global optimum must either be located at the trough of some feasible basin or some particular point along the feasibility boundary. Presented in this paper is an instance of optinformatics where a new concept of modeling the feasibility structure of inequality-constrained optimization problems-dubbed the feasibility structure modeling-is proposed to perform geometrical predictions of the locations of candidate solutions in the solution space: deep inside any infeasible region, nearby any feasibility boundary, or deep inside any feasible region. This knowledge may be unknown prior to executing an MA but it can be mined as the search for the global optimum progresses. As more solutions are generated and subsequently stored in the database, the feasibility structure can thus be approximated more accurately. As an integral part, a new paradigm of incorporating the classification-rather than the regression-into the framework of MAs is introduced, allowing the MAs to estimate the feasibility boundary such that effective assessments of whether or not the candidate solutions should experience local refinements can be made. This eventually helps preventing the unnecessary refinements and consequently reducing the number of function evaluations required to reach the global optimum.
  • Keywords
    constraint handling; convergence; evolutionary computation; optimisation; pattern recognition; computational power; computational time; constrained memetic algorithm; constrained optimization; constraint function; convergence analysis; effective chaperone; feasibility boundary; feasibility structure modeling; feasible region; geometrical prediction; optimum progress; optinformatics; Algorithm design and analysis; Databases; Memetics; Optimization; Search problems; Stochastic processes; Support vector machines; Convergence analysis; evolutionary algorithms; memetic algorithms; optimization; pattern recognition;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1089-778X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TEVC.2009.2039141
  • Filename
    5570981