• DocumentCode
    1343631
  • Title

    Ethics for editors: an analytical decision-making process

  • Author

    Allen, Lindsay ; Voss, D.

  • Author_Institution
    Tech. Commun. Dept., Metropolitan State Coll., Denver, CO
  • Volume
    41
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1998
  • fDate
    3/1/1998 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    58
  • Lastpage
    65
  • Abstract
    Editors face ethical dilemmas when conflicts arise between their loyalties to readers, to authors, and to employers. They can systematically resolve such conflicts by applying an analytical decision-making process called “value analysis”. This six-step process enables editors to take advantage of a model to rank core values and resolve the issue in favor of the more important value. An examination of codes of ethics of communication-related professional organizations identified ten core values to use in applying the model
  • Keywords
    technical presentation; text editing; analytical decision making process; author loyalties; communication-related professional organizations; core value ranking; editors; employer loyalties; ethics; reader loyalties; value analysis; Collaborative work; Contracts; Decision making; Error correction; Ethics; Missiles; Professional communication; Protection; Remuneration; Scheduling;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0361-1434
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/47.661631
  • Filename
    661631