DocumentCode
1344397
Title
N-version design versus one good version
Author
Hatton, Les
Author_Institution
Oakwood Comput., New Malden, UK
Volume
14
Issue
6
fYear
1997
Firstpage
71
Lastpage
76
Abstract
Evidence indicates that n-version development techniques are more reliable than producing one “good” version-and cost effective in the long run. The author concludes that diverse, independent channels used in parallel are significantly superior to even the current state of the art, especially in situations where cost of failure is high
Keywords
configuration management; software cost estimation; software development management; cost effective; diverse independent channels; failure costs; n-version design; n-version software development techniques; software versions; Aerospace control; Aerospace engineering; Aircraft; Communication cables; Concurrent computing; Costs; Design engineering; Floors; Hardware; Voting;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Software, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0740-7459
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/52.636672
Filename
636672
Link To Document