Title :
N-version design versus one good version
Author_Institution :
Oakwood Comput., New Malden, UK
Abstract :
Evidence indicates that n-version development techniques are more reliable than producing one “good” version-and cost effective in the long run. The author concludes that diverse, independent channels used in parallel are significantly superior to even the current state of the art, especially in situations where cost of failure is high
Keywords :
configuration management; software cost estimation; software development management; cost effective; diverse independent channels; failure costs; n-version design; n-version software development techniques; software versions; Aerospace control; Aerospace engineering; Aircraft; Communication cables; Concurrent computing; Costs; Design engineering; Floors; Hardware; Voting;
Journal_Title :
Software, IEEE