DocumentCode
1353410
Title
Point/Counterpoint
Author
Woods, Eoin ; Emery, David ; Selic, Bran
Author_Institution
BlackRock
Volume
27
Issue
6
fYear
2010
Firstpage
54
Lastpage
57
Abstract
The authors of this issue\´s "Point/Counterpoint" department debate the merits of UML as a useful tool. Eoin Woods and David Emery, in "Is UML Sufficient for Describing Architectures?", posit that although widely used, UML has some serious limitations as an architecture description language, while Bran Selic, in "UML 2: Designed for Architects," states that contrary to widespread misconceptions, UML 2 includes a very powerful set of language features intended specifically for software architects.
Keywords
Investments; Software development; Unified modeling language; UML; Unified Modeling Language; software development; stakeholders;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Software, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0740-7459
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MS.2010.145
Filename
5604361
Link To Document