On the fairness of large CSMA networks

We characterize the fairness of decentralized medium access control protocols based on CSMA/CA, in large multi-hop wireless networks. In particular, we show that the widely observed unfairness of these protocols in small network topologies does not always persist in large topologies. In regular networks, this unfairness is essentially due to the unfair advantage of nodes at the border of the network, which have a restricted neighborhood and thus a higher probability to access the communication channel. In large 1D lattice networks these border effects do not propagate inside the network, and nodes sufficiently far away from the border have equal access to the channel; as a result the protocol is long-term fair. In 2D lattice networks, we observe a phase transition. If the access intensity of the protocol is small, the border effects remain local and the protocol behaves similarly as in one-dimensional networks. However, if the access intensity of the protocol is large enough, the border effects persist independently of the size of the network and the protocol is strongly unfair. In irregular networks, the topology is inherently unfair. This unfairness increases with the access intensity of the protocol, but in a much smoother way than in regular two-dimensional networks. Finally, in situations where the protocol is long-term fair, we provide a characterization of its short-term fairness.