• DocumentCode
    1363338
  • Title

    Complex principal components for robust motion estimation

  • Author

    Mauldin, F. William, Jr. ; Viola, Francesco ; Walker, William F.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
  • Volume
    57
  • Issue
    11
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    11/1/2010 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    2437
  • Lastpage
    2449
  • Abstract
    Bias and variance errors in motion estimation result from electronic noise, decorrelation, aliasing, and inherent algorithm limitations. Unlike most error sources, decorrelation is coherent over time and has the same power spectrum as the signal. Thus, reducing decorrelation is impossible through frequency domain filtering or simple averaging and must be achieved through other methods. In this paper, we present a novel motion estimator, termed the principal component displacement estimator (PCDE), which takes advantage of the signal separation capabilities of principal component analysis (PCA) to reject decorrelation and noise. Furthermore, PCDE only requires the computation of a single principal component, enabling computational speed that is on the same order of magnitude or faster than the commonly used Loupas algorithm. Unlike prior PCA strategies, PCDE uses complex data to generate motion estimates using only a single principal component. The use of complex echo data is critical because it allows for separation of signal components based on motion, which is revealed through phase changes of the complex principal components. PCDE operates on the assumption that the signal component of interest is also the most energetic component in an ensemble of echo data. This assumption holds in most clinical ultrasound environments. However, in environments where electronic noise SNR is less than 0 dB or in blood flow data for which the wall signal dominates the signal from blood flow, the calculation of more than one PC is required to obtain the signal of interest. We simulated synthetic ultrasound data to assess the performance of PCDE over a wide range of imaging conditions and in the presence of decorrelation and additive noise. Under typical ultrasonic elasticity imaging conditions (0.98 signal correlation, 25 dB SNR, 1 sample shift), PCDE decreased estimation bias by more than 10% and standard deviation by more than 30% compared with the Loupas method and normalized - ross-correlation with cosine fitting (NC CF). More modest gains were observed relative to spline-based time delay estimation (sTDE). PCDE was also tested on experimental elastography data. Compressions of approximately 1.5% were applied to a CIRS elastography phantom with embedded 10.4-mmdiameter lesions that had moduli contrasts of -9.2, -5.9, and 12.0 dB. The standard deviation of displacement estimates was reduced by at least 67% in homogeneous regions at 35 to 40 mm in depth with respect to estimates produced by Loupas, NC CF, and sTDE. Greater improvements in CNR and displacement standard deviation were observed at larger depths where speckle decorrelation and other noise sources were more significant.
  • Keywords
    decorrelation; interference suppression; motion estimation; principal component analysis; splines (mathematics); PCA; PCDE; SNR; additive noise; blood flow data; complex echo data; electronic noise; frequency domain filtering; inherent algorithm; power spectrum; principal component analysis; principal component displacement estimator; robust motion estimation; sTDE; signal separation capabilities; signal to noise ratio; speckle decorrelation; spline-based time delay estimation; ultrasonic elasticity imaging conditions; ultrasound environment; variance errors; Acoustics; Correlation; Decorrelation; Motion estimation; Noise measurement; Principal component analysis; Computer Simulation; Models, Biological; Movement; Phantoms, Imaging; Principal Component Analysis; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Ultrasonography;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0885-3010
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1710
  • Filename
    5611691