• DocumentCode
    1364490
  • Title

    Projection space image reconstruction using strip functions to calculate pixels more "natural" for modeling the geometric response of the SPECT collimator

  • Author

    Hsieh, Yu-Lung ; Zeng, Gengsheng L. ; Gullberg, Grant T.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Radiol., Utah Univ., Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • Volume
    17
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    1998
  • Firstpage
    24
  • Lastpage
    44
  • Abstract
    The spatially varying geometric response of the collimator-detector system in single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) causes loss in resolution, shape distortions, reconstructed density nonuniformity, and quantitative inaccuracies. A projection space image reconstruction algorithm is used to correct these reconstruction artifacts. The projectors F use strip functions to calculate pixels more "natural" for modeling the two-dimensional (2-D) geometric response of the SPECT collimator transaxially to the axis of rotation. These projectors are defined by summing the intersection of an array of multiple strips rotated at equal angles to approximate the ideal system geometric response of the collimator. Two projection models were evaluated for modeling the system geometric response function. For one projector each strip is of equal weight, for the other projector a Gaussian weighting is used. Parallel beam and fan beam projections of a physical three-dimensional (3-D) Hoffman brain phantom and a Jaszczak cold rod phantom were used to evaluate the geometric response correction. Reconstructions were obtained by using the singular value decomposition (SVD) method and the iterative conjugate gradient algorithm to solve for q in the imaging equation FGq=p, where p is the projection measurement. The projector F included the new models for the geometric response, whereas, the backprojector G did not always model the geometric response in order to increase the computational speed. The final reconstruction was obtained by sampling the backprojection Gq at a discrete array of points. Reconstructions produced by the two proposed projectors showed improved resolution when compared against a unit-strip "natural" pixel model, the conventional image pixelized model with ray tracing to calculate the geometric response, and the filtered backprojection algorithm. When the reconstruction is displayed on fine grid points, the continuity and resolution of the image is preserved wit- - hout the ring artifacts seen in the unit-strip "natural" pixel model. With present computing power, the geometric response correction using the proposed projection space reconstruction approach is not yet feasible for routine clinical use.
  • Keywords
    image reconstruction; iterative methods; medical image processing; modelling; single photon emission computed tomography; singular value decomposition; Gaussian weighting; Jaszczak cold rod phantom; SPECT collimator geometric response modeling; fan beam; iterative conjugate gradient algorithm; medical diagnostic imaging; nuclear medicine; parallel beam; physical three-dimensional Hoffman brain phantom; pixels calculation; projection space image reconstruction; quantitative inaccuracies; reconstructed density nonuniformity; reconstruction artifacts correction; shape distortions; strip functions; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Imaging phantoms; Optical collimators; Pixel; Shape; Single photon emission computed tomography; Solid modeling; Spatial resolution; Strips; Algorithms; Artifacts; Brain; Models, Theoretical; Phantoms, Imaging; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/42.668692
  • Filename
    668692