DocumentCode :
1379708
Title :
Toward a document evaluation methodology: what does research tell us about the validity and reliability of evaluation methods?
Author :
De Jong, Menno ; Schellens, Peter Jan
Author_Institution :
Twente Univ., Enschede, Netherlands
Volume :
43
Issue :
3
fYear :
2000
fDate :
9/1/2000 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
242
Lastpage :
260
Abstract :
Although the usefulness of evaluating documents has become generally accepted among communication professionals, the supporting research that puts evaluation practices empirically to the test is only beginning to emerge. This article presents an overview of the available research on troubleshooting evaluation methods. Four lines of research are distinguished concerning the validity of evaluation methods, sample composition, sample size, and the implementation of evaluation results during revision
Keywords :
document handling; human factors; professional communication; reliability; sampling methods; system documentation; testing; communication professionals; congruent validity; document evaluation methodology; document revision; evaluation methods reliability; evaluation methods validity; evaluation results implementation; expert judgments; formative evaluation; human-computer interaction; predictive validity; research; sample composition; sample size; troubleshooting; usability testing; Human computer interaction; Monitoring; Professional communication; Research initiatives; Statistical analysis; Testing; Usability;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0361-1434
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/47.867941
Filename :
867941
Link To Document :
بازگشت