DocumentCode
1433457
Title
Electronic document authentication
Author
Jueneman, R.R.
Author_Institution
Comput. Sci. Corp., Falls Church, VA, USA
Volume
1
Issue
2
fYear
1987
fDate
4/1/1987 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
17
Lastpage
23
Abstract
Digital signature techniques such as the Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA) scheme can be used to establish both the authenticity of a document and the identity of its originator. However, because of the computationally-intensive nature of the RSA algorithm, most digital signature schemes make use of a checksum technique to summarize or represent the document, and then digitally sign the checksum. Message authentication codes (MACs), based on the Data Encryption Standard (DES), are often used for this purpose. It is shown that cryptographic checksums that are intended to detect fraudulent messages must be on the order of 128 bits in length, and the ANSI X9.9-1986 message authentication standard is criticized on that basis. In addition, architectural arguments are advanced to illustrate the advantages of a checksum algorithm that is not based on the use of cryptography and does not require the use of a secret key. Manipulation detection codes (MDC) are defined as a class of checksum algorithms that can detect both accidental and malicious modifications of an electronic message or document, without requiring the use of a cryptographic key.
Keywords
codes; cryptography; security of data; Data Encryption Standard; RSA; Rivest-Shamir-Adleman; checksum technique; cryptographic checksums; digital signature schemes; electronic document authentication; fraudulent messages; manipulation detection codes; message authentication codes; Algorithm design and analysis; Authentication; Digital signatures; Encryption; Message authentication;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Network, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0890-8044
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MNET.1987.6434187
Filename
6434187
Link To Document