• DocumentCode
    1438948
  • Title

    Evaluating ScanSAR Interferometry Deformation Time Series Using Bursted Stripmap Data

  • Author

    Buckley, Sean M. ; Gudipati, Krishnavikas

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Aerosp. Eng. & Eng. Mech., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  • Volume
    49
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    6/1/2011 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    2335
  • Lastpage
    2342
  • Abstract
    We demonstrate scanning synthetic aperture radar (ScanSAR) advanced radar interferometry processing for surface deformation time series analysis. We apply the small baseline subsets (SBAS) technique to ScanSAR data synthesized from 40 ERS-1 and ERS-2 stripmap SAR images over known deformation in Phoenix, Arizona. The strategy is to construct a burst pattern similar to Envisat ScanSAR data for two scenarios, namely, an idealized 100% burst overlap case and a realistic variable-burst synchronization case in which any image pair has at least 50% burst overlap. We And this latter scenario to be reasonable based on an assessment of the effect of burst overlap on Phoenix interferometric phase coherence. The differences between the variable burst overlap ScanSAR and stripmap SAR SBAS-derived pixel velocities have a mean of 0.02 cm/year and a standard deviation of 0.02 cm/year. It is noted that one can expect SBAS velocity and displacement one-sigma errors of 0.1 cm/year and 0.5 cm, respectively, from multilooked stripmap data. We observe that 96% and 99% of the variable burst overlap ScanSAR pixel velocities are within ±0.1 and ±0.2 cm/year (one- and two-sigma), respectively, of our stripmap SAR pixel velocities. These results are similar to those reported for SBAS analysis applied to low-resolution multilook interferograms derived from coherence-preserving down sampling of stripmap data. We also And that the rms deviations between variable burst overlap ScanSAR and stripmap SBAS displacement estimates are 0.40 ± 0.30 cm. 68% and 94% of the variable burst overlap ScanSAR pixel displacements are within ±0.5 and ±1.0 cm, respectively, of the stripmap displacements.
  • Keywords
    data analysis; geophysical image processing; geophysical techniques; radar interferometry; synthetic aperture radar; time series; Arizona; ERS-2 stripmap SAR image; Envisat ScanSAR data analysis; Phoenix interferometric phase coherence; ScanSAR data synthesis; ScanSAR interferometry; bursted stripmap data analysis; low-resolution multilook interferogram; scanning synthetic aperture radar advanced radar interferometry; small baseline subsets technique; stripmap SAR SBAS-derived pixel velocity; stripmap SBAS displacement estimation; surface deformation time series analysis; Azimuth; Correlation; Decorrelation; Imaging; Interferometry; Pixel; Time series analysis; Deformation time series; interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR); scanning synthetic aperture radar (ScanSAR); small baseline subsets (SBAS);
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.2010.2102360
  • Filename
    5704576