DocumentCode :
1447706
Title :
Comparison between different methods for evaluating the anisotropy field distribution in recording systems
Author :
Bottoni, G. ; Candolfo, D. ; Cecchetti, A.
Author_Institution :
Dipartimento di Fisica, Ferrara Univ., Italy
Volume :
36
Issue :
5
fYear :
2000
fDate :
9/1/2000 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
2441
Lastpage :
2443
Abstract :
The determination of the anisotropy field distribution P(Hα) is made by the second derivative of the magnetization measured perpendicularly to the easy magnetization direction, in the range from saturation to remanence, for a number of magnetic in the same systems. The transverse susceptibility χ(H) is measured in the same systems. For the systems where the particles are “perfectly” aligned the peak of P(Hα) is located at the same field of the peak of χ(H). In the systems where an appreciable fraction of particles are misaligned the peak of P(Hα) is shifted to lower fields while that of χ(H) does not change its position. The coincidence of the two peaks is assumed as a criterion for the validity of the P(Ha) distribution
Keywords :
magnetic anisotropy; magnetic particles; magnetic recording; magnetic susceptibility; magnetisation; remanence; anisotropy field distribution; easy axis; magnetic recording; magnetization; particulate medium; remanence; saturation magnetization; transverse susceptibility; Anisotropic magnetoresistance; Assembly; Equations; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetic hysteresis; Magnetic recording; Magnetization; Perpendicular magnetic recording; Remanence; Solenoids;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9464
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/20.908460
Filename :
908460
Link To Document :
بازگشت