Title :
Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images
Author :
Peer, Siegfried ; Neitzel, Ulrich ; Giacomuzzi, Salvatore M. ; Peer, Regina ; Gassner, Eva ; Steingruber, Iris ; Jaschke, Werner
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Radiol., Univ. Hosp., Innsbruck, Austria
fDate :
3/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
A contrast detail analysis was performed to compare perception of low-contrast details on X-ray images derived from digital storage phosphor radiography and from a flat panel detector system based on a cesium iodide/amorphous silicon matrix. The CDRAD 2.0 phantom was used to perform a comparative contrast detail analysis of a clinical storage phosphor radiography system and an indirect type digital flat panel detector unit. Images were acquired at exposure levels comparable to film speeds of 50/100/200/400 and 800. Four observers evaluated a total of 50 films with respect to the threshold contrast for each detail size. The numbers of correctly identified objects were determined for all image subsets. The overall results show that low-contrast detail perception with digital flat panel detector images is better than with state of the art storage phosphor screens. This is especially true for the low-exposure setting, where a nearly 10% higher correct observation ratio is reached. Given its high detective quantum efficiency the digital flat panel technology based on the cesium iodide scintillator/amorphous silicon matrix is best suited for detection of low-contrast detail structures, which shows its high potential for clinical imaging.
Keywords :
X-ray detection; diagnostic radiography; flat panel displays; solid scintillation detectors; visual perception; CDRAD 2.0 phantom; CsI-Si; X-ray images; cesium iodide scintillator; cesium iodide/amorphous silicon matrix; clinical imaging; correctly identified objects; detail size; digital flat panel detector images; digital storage phosphor radiography; exposure levels; film speeds; four observers; high detective quantum efficiency; image subsets; indirect type digital flat panel detector unit; low-contrast detail perception; low-exposure setting; storage phosphor radiographs; threshold contrast; Amorphous silicon; Image analysis; Image storage; Imaging phantoms; Performance analysis; Phosphors; Radiography; X-ray detection; X-ray detectors; X-ray imaging; Humans; Observer Variation; Phantoms, Imaging; Radiographic Image Enhancement;
Journal_Title :
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on