DocumentCode
1478190
Title
Value Conflicts in Computational Modeling
Author
Fleischmann, Kenneth R. ; Wallace, William A.
Author_Institution
Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Volume
43
Issue
7
fYear
2010
fDate
7/1/2010 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
57
Lastpage
63
Abstract
What value conflicts influence the success of the modeling process and of models as products? Clients commission models, modelers develop models, users use models, and many other members of society are affected by models. These different groups all have different values, leading to value conflicts that influence the success of both the modeling process and of models as products. Data collection included in-depth, semi-structured interviews at three field sites: a corporate research laboratory, an academic research laboratory, and a government research laboratory. Three key value conflicts influence the success of the modeling process: timeliness versus completeness, innovation versus reliability, and honesty versus obedience. Value conflicts among different groups influence the success of models as products, including: the modelers versus their organization, the modelers versus the clients, and the clients versus the users. Thus, understanding value conflicts can help us to understand the ethical implications of models.
Keywords
ethical aspects; storage management; academic research laboratory; computational modeling; corporate research laboratory; data collection; government research laboratory; honesty versus obedience; innovation versus reliability; modeling process; timeliness versus completeness; value conflicts; Computational modeling; Computer industry; Educational institutions; Ethics; Government; Humans; Laboratories; Pensions; Systems engineering and theory; Technological innovation; Human values; Human-centered computing; Professional ethics;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Computer
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9162
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MC.2010.120
Filename
5453328
Link To Document